Use cases

Complex decisions deserve a rehearsal.

Wargaming is useful when several actors can adapt, decisions are consequential, and feedback or delays make a static plan unreliable. The examples below are illustrative questions, not client work or predicted outcomes.

The fit test

When is a wargame justified?

A game should serve a named decision. We use three complexity tests, then require a decision owner and a specific question before designing play.

01

Interacting actors

Is there an adaptive competitor, adversary, stakeholder group or several parties with divergent incentives?

02

Consequential choice

Is the decision time-sensitive, expensive to reverse or difficult to test in the real world?

03

System behaviour

Could feedback loops, delays or cascading dependencies defeat first-order intuition?

REQUIRED

Decision owner

Who will use the findings, and what precise decision must the game inform?

If only one complexity condition applies, an analytical study, workshop or tabletop walkthrough may be more useful. The owner and question are prerequisites, not a scoring point. This is a scoping heuristic, not a validated numerical rule.

Corporate

Corporate decisions

01

Activist investor or hostile bid

Decision question: Who holds decision rights at each stage, and what will the board concede, if anything, and when?

Board, investors, proxy advisers and bidders can set a fast-moving public narrative.

02

Competitor response to a major move

Decision question: Does market entry, a pricing reset or capacity expansion still pay if an incumbent responds?

A competitor cell can test retaliation against the economics assumed in a business case.

03

Post-merger integration

Decision question: What must be secured in the first 100 days while competitors seek customers and talent?

Internal integration demands and external poaching can reinforce attrition.

04

Ransomware or cyber extortion

Decision question: Who decides on containment, disclosure, restoration and any extortion demand, and in what sequence?

Legal, technical, operational and communication clocks may differ; applicable reporting duties must be checked for each case.

05

Supply-chain chokepoint failure

Decision question: Which sourcing, inventory and customer-allocation choices should be made before a critical node fails?

Stock-outs may emerge after a delay; responses by other buyers can intensify scarcity.

06

Regulatory regime shift

Decision question: Should the organisation adapt minimally, influence a consultation where lawful, or redesign for advantage?

Regulators, industry bodies and competitors respond on different timelines.

07

Business-model disruption

Decision question: When should an incumbent replace part of its own revenue before a new model does it?

A game can expose capability-build delays and conflicting internal incentives.

08

Product safety or reputation crisis

Decision question: What triggers recall, disclosure or service suspension, and who can authorise it out of hours?

Customer trust, legal advice, employee information and public communication interact.

09

High-stakes negotiation

Decision question: What is the real walk-away position, and what coalitions can the other party build?

A credible counterpart cell tests assumptions about leverage and concessions.

10

Liquidity and financial stress

Decision question: Which actions stop funding pressure, counterparty caution and reputation loss from amplifying one another?

Treasury, board and communications decisions may need to align before conditions deteriorate.

Government

Government decisions

11

Grey-zone maritime coercion

Decision question: Which agency owns each response option below an armed-conflict threshold?

Attribution, jurisdiction, signalling and private maritime interests complicate escalation management.

12

Border crisis and escalation

Decision question: What signals might each response send, and where could either side misread intent?

Domestic audiences, incomplete information and reciprocal moves matter.

13

Critical infrastructure cascade

Decision question: Which services are restored first when power, telecoms, water, finance and transport depend on one another?

A restoration plan can fail at inter-agency and operator handoffs.

14

Multi-site terrorist attack

Decision question: How is unified command maintained across agencies while information is incomplete and media is live?

The game can test coordination, public communication and decision authority at a high level.

15

Mass-scale emergency

Decision question: How are scarce resources allocated across jurisdictions over a prolonged event?

Duration brings fatigue, compliance changes and political pressure into the model.

16

Economic coercion and sanctions exposure

Decision question: How do financial, trade and diplomatic choices interact when external restrictions change?

Banks, insurers, firms and partner governments may respond differently.

17

Information operations and election integrity

Decision question: Who verifies a fast-moving false claim, and how is a lawful response coordinated before voting or counting is affected?

Platforms, election authorities, media and security agencies have distinct duties.

18

Policy stress test before rollout

Decision question: How might regulated parties adapt to a subsidy, incentive or tax change?

A game can reveal perverse incentives, gaps and implementation friction before rollout.

Joint public–private

Joint public–private decisions

19

Strategic maritime chokepoint closure

Decision question: How do reserves, refiners, shipping, insurance and state capacity interact through a sustained closure?

The critical decisions often occur at the boundary between government and industry.

20

Insider threat in safety-critical systems

Decision question: Where might detection and intervention fail when a trusted operator is involved?

Operators, regulators and workforce representatives must balance safety, privacy and fair reporting.

Additional scenario ideas

Specialist scenarios for tailored design.

These further examples may need sector experts, legal advice, technical modelling or joint agency participation. They are prompts for scoping, not claims that Full Ahead has delivered each type of exercise.

Advanced scenario library

Corporate specialist scenarios

01

Multiple maritime and supply chokepoints

Decision question: Which rerouting, buffer and customer-priority decisions remain workable if several routes are disrupted together?

02

Activism plus contested acquisition

Decision question: How do the board, bidders, advisers and holders respond when an activist campaign and bid overlap?

03

Asymmetric platform disruption

Decision question: When should a firm change its own offer as a new platform changes customer expectations?

04

Compound cyber, operational and financial crisis

Decision question: How do restoration, disclosure, financing and stakeholder confidence interact in one incident?

05

Biopharma loss of exclusivity

Decision question: How might originators, competitors, payers and prescribers react as exclusivity ends?

06

Sanctions and forced market exit

Decision question: Which staged decisions preserve lawful options, people and critical operations as restrictions change?

07

Post-merger informal network loss

Decision question: Which hidden relationships sustain delivery and customer trust through integration?

08

Major physical asset incident

Decision question: How do technical response, public communication, insurers and authorities coordinate after a serious loss?

09

Market liquidity and counterparty contagion

Decision question: Which exposures and decisions matter as counterparties become cautious together?

10

Critical mineral or semiconductor squeeze

Decision question: How do allocation, substitution, sourcing and rival demand change the feasible options?

Advanced scenario library

Government specialist scenarios

11

Subsea infrastructure disruption

Decision question: How are attribution, public communication and cross-agency response coordinated after an undersea service loss?

12

National infrastructure blackstart

Decision question: Which interdependent services and authorities must be sequenced to restore essential functions?

13

Sovereign debt and currency stress

Decision question: How do policy signals, reserves, banking confidence and external actors interact under market stress?

14

Novel outbreak and information disorder

Decision question: How do health measures, supply allocation and public trust evolve over a prolonged emergency?

15

Frontier AI governance under competitive pressure

Decision question: How do regulators, developers, users and other jurisdictions respond to different governance choices?

16

Orbital debris and satellite-service loss

Decision question: What continuity decisions matter if navigation, timing or communications services degrade?

17

Multiple food-system shocks

Decision question: How do reserves, trade restrictions, prices and humanitarian needs interact across borders?

18

Compound urban disaster

Decision question: How are rescue, health, utilities and transport priorities coordinated when hazards overlap?

19

Electoral misinformation crisis

Decision question: How do election authorities and platforms verify claims and communicate without compromising lawful process?

20

Energy transition and grid stress

Decision question: How do reliability, affordability and transition choices perform under prolonged supply stress?

Design discipline

Make the game analytical, not theatrical.

01

Credible challenge

Give opposing or alternative perspectives a real voice. Red-team behaviour should reflect plausible incentives and constraints.

02

Transparent adjudication

Agree how moves are assessed using suitable models, evidence and expert judgment; record uncertainty rather than hiding it.

03

Decision trace

Capture options, timing, assumptions, information gaps and handoffs, not just the final position.

04

Model revision

Use observed behaviour to update the model and translate validated findings into actions or SOPs where appropriate.

Method and context

Evidence informs the scenario. It does not guarantee a result.

These illustrations combine Full Ahead’s proposed method with public risk and decision-support material. Real design requires a defined sponsor, access to relevant evidence and subject-matter validation.

Explore further

See the method in action.

Review the sample outputs and try the decision fit check before we speak.

Illustrative outputs ↗   Decision fit check ↗

Start a confidential conversation

Bring the decision. We will help frame the game.

Email a short outline without sensitive details. We can then discuss the decision, stakeholders and appropriate scope.